Design a vertical antenna for portable use. Vertical antennas for portable use are designed for one principal HF/VHF/UHF amateur band only; they have an advantage over other types of antenna in that they receive and transmit omni-directionally, i.e. in all directions. Radiation patterns in elevation typically show low-angle vertically-polarized radiation, so verticals can be very good DX antennas, especially when used in open areas free of vertically-oriented conducting objects like trees, etc. Read more...
NEW This app now offers the user the opportunity to design a 1/4-wave vertical with a shortened vertical element, particularly suitable for use in the lower HF bands. This is accomplished by including a calculator to be used to define the dimensions and electrical properties of a loading coil specifically to compensate for the shortening of the vertical element.
Get started » » »
|
|
Set antenna color: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vertical antenna designer
portable-antennas.com
Antenna feed-point: ⬥
Load coil: ●
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Here you can generate plots of
radiation patterns,
VSWR chart, antenna currents diagram and Smith chart for your antenna over a
choice of ground types. By changing the physical dimensions of the antenna, and refreshing these plots, you can learn a lot about
how such antennas will perform in the field.
Please note that
radiation patterns are here modelled over flat ground -
when the antenna is erected on a hill-top or mountain summit, the surrounding sloping ground will generally cause angles in
the elevation radiation pattern to be lowered in the direction of the
slope: the steeper the slope, the lower the effective elevation take-off angle will be, and the better the chances of making
long-distance contacts.
Read more...
Note also that, for vertical antennas, the NEC engine used to generate the data for the elevation radiation pattern over-estimates the radiated gain at angles below the pseudo-Brewster angle specific to the antenna, ground type and frequency: this is due to unmodelled ground absorption effects. Below this angle, the gains are less, and often much less, than are presented in the elevation pattern.
|
Choose ground type of
land in the vicinity of the antenna: |
Conductivity:
S/m
Dielectric const.:
F/m
|
| View radiation patterns: |
|
| Choose type: | |
| Set ref. elevation angle: |
|
| Set ref. azimuth angle: |
|
| Impedance transformer: | unun |
| View VSWR chart: | |
| Effect of coax on VSWR: |
Coax length:
Type:
Effect of coax- and system-losses on VSWRWhen a coaxial cable is used to connect the antenna to a transmitter, the cable introduces signal loss, the magnitude of which can vary strongly with both frequency and antenna feed-point impedance. The main blue VSWR curve for this antenna is calculated at the antenna feed-point. The optional green curve represents the VSWR "seen" at the transmitter after losses in the coaxial cable are taken into account. At frequencies of antenna resonance, the blue and green curves usually coincide closely, since the coax contributes little additional attenuation at those frequencies. At frequencies away from resonance, however — often those corresponding to WARC bands — the feed-point impedance may become highly mismatched, producing very high VSWR values in the blue curve while the green curve shows substantially lower values. This reduction in VSWR at the transmitter occurs because signal losses in the coaxial cable attenuate both the forward and reflected waves. As a result, the reflected signal returning to the transmitter is weaker, causing the transmitter-end VSWR to appear lower than the actual feed-point VSWR. This effect can make some bands appear more "usable" from the transmitter's perspective, even though the antenna system may still be operating inefficiently at those frequencies. The green curve represents the "flattening" of the VSWR caused by the coax. Additional losses elsewhere in the system can further reduce the transmitter-end VSWR - these may include:
The magnitude of such losses, and their effect on actual radiated RF power, can only be estimated reliably through careful analysis of a particular antenna setup. In every-day portable operations, such losses can only be roughly estimated; however, comparisons can be made between commercially-produced EFHW and OCFD antennas for amateur radio use, and carefully-configured NEC models of those same antennas. Useful estimates can then be made of the efficiency of the commercial products by comparing their published VSWR curves, and the VSWR curves produced from the models. Improved transmitter-end VSWR therefore does not necessarily imply improved radiation efficiency: in some cases, a significant proportion of the transmitted power may simply be lost: dissipated as heat within the antenna system. Read more... |
| View currents diagram: | |
| View Smith chart: |
|
|
Antenna gains at 0° elevation: |
|
| Feed-point impedance: | |
| Estimated bandwidth: | |